DISCLAIMER: This CubicAO website doesn't claim to offer any "Cubic Prophecies". This CubicAO site is a secondary, unofficial site that is subordinate to TimeCube.com. This CubicAO site is not intended to be glorified above TimeCube.com. Scientists don't know what gravity is, they don't know what physics is. We must attack the scientists, Academia and religion, or face cannibalism like Easter Island. CubicAO is not intended to be more powerful than Dr Gene Ray's Time Cube site, and indeed CubicAO is separate from Dr Gene Ray's Time Cube site. This CubicAO site is not intended to contain excessive amounts of artwork.

Now in category: Time Cube PrincipleClick for category: Time Cube in NatureClick for category: Time Cube and Humanity
Now in category: Time Cube Principle
Click to return to CubicAO homepage
Chair of Wisdom. New to Time Cube? Unacquainted therewith, uninitiated thereto? CLICK HERE

Principle of Opposites

"Why something rather than nothing?" This is a fundamental philosophical question. But when Gene Ray analysed it, he invoked the Principle of Opposites.

Opposites are required for there to be "something". First, however, let's consider that other concept—the concept of "nothing". Let's think about a singularity.

A singularity is nothing. It's zero. It's a single, solitary point. There's no existence outside of it—you can't go in or out.

Depiction of a singularity. A singularity is a single-point, a point-of-zero, and it represents nonexistence.

It's a state of nonexistence. So now, let's move one step higher, and travel from "nothing" to "something". Let's add another point...

Another point has been introduced. Now there are two points.

...and, let's assume that these two points aren't just two separate singularities, but that you can jump between them.

Now, let's draw a line that passes through the two points:

A line has been drawn between the two points.

This is the first level of existence. It allows you to move back and forth between a fixed series of points. (It can be simplified to a perceived continuum. However, in reality, it is not infinitely subdivisible, due to the disproof of infinity).

Continuing, let's consider a single point on the line. This point shall divide the line in half.

A single point on a line, dividing the line in half.

Add in a line segment—that is, the line between two points.

A line segment has now been added to the diagram, and stands separately from the halved line.

Add arrows from each of those two points, extending inwards along the line segment. Now add arrows outwards from the point that halves the initial line.

The line segment extends inwards from its two end-points. Conversely, the two halves of the line extend outwards from the halving-point.

We see a harmonic correlation. Both the line segment and the halved line possess a set of two diametrically opposed arrows.

A harmonic correlation is evident: the two inwards directions from the ends of the line segment are harmonic to the two outwards directions extending along each of the halves of the halved line.

But what if we do something like this?...

A doubling of the initial harmonic configuration, introducing greater complexity to the geometry

Nope, there's nothing special here, because we can simplify it down to a mere doubling of the initial harmonic configuration.

This, then, is the principle of opposites. Two opposite halves, and two opposite terminal points of the line segment.

It's a principle of linear opposites. They are static linear opposites—for they must always be diametrically opposed. If you try to rotate them, they violate the constraints imposed by the line of which they're part. They move beyond the first level of existence.

We can't rotate those points out of the line, otherwise they would transcend the first level of existence, and enter the second or third.

You could move them back and forth, and change their antipodal magnitude. But the fact remains unchanged that they are diametrically opposed. They still remain static opposites.

An illustration of antipodal magnitude: that is to say, the distance between the opposite antipodes.

You could move them together, and cause them to converge into a single point. Their antipodal magnitude would then be zero.

But of course, this would regress them from the first level of existence to the lowest level. They would become a single point—that is to say, a singularity.

Thus, we have established a principle of equal opposites; equal antipodes. (They are equal in that they are interchangeable—for instance, one could just as well refer to the North Pole as the "South Pole", and vice versa, being that "north" and "south" are mere arbitrary names.)

They are equal, they are static, and they are linear. And to the question, "Why something rather than nothing", they are the simplest answer, for they are the first step beyond nonexistence. They are the lowest level of "something"; the lowest level of existence.

This established, proof proceeds:

CASE 1

A singularity, or single point, is a zero point. It represents nonexistence. Let us, however, assume that if we take several of these points, we will be able to move them around and interlink or unlink them.

CASE 2

From CASE 1, we take several points, placing them in series. This series can be travelled through. A line is formed. This is the first level of existence.

CASE 3

From CASE 2, we take a line, and, with a single point from CASE 1, divide it in two.

CASE 4

From CASE 2, we create a line segment: that is, a line extending between two points.

CASE 5

From CASE 3, the two halves extend outwards from the halving point in two diametrically opposed directions. From CASE 4, the line segment, from its two ends, extends inwards in two diametrically opposed directions. There is a harmonic correlation between the two sets of diametrically opposed directions. This correlation stands as a fundamental property of the first level of existence. It exists within this first level, and what it forms is a principle of static, equal opposites.

Click here to view the above section of proof in the context of CubicAO's Full Time Cube Proof

Further point:

Positive and negative electric charges are equal opposites. An electron moving left is equivalent to a positron moving right.

Q: Why a straight line? Why not a sinuous (curvy) or zigzag one?

If you have two points in series, then a direction has been defined, to which all other points must concur. If you define many directions, you are causing rotation; thus you are transcending the first level of existence and entering the second. See article 4 is the Supreme Number of the Universe.

YOU can't handle Cubic Time, Cubic Life or Cubic Truth - for inside of Time Cube equates the most magnificent Symmetry of opposites existing within the universe - for every corner has an equal opposite corner, every 2 corners has an equal opposite 2 corners, every tri-corner has an equal opposite tri-corner and every 4 corners has an equal opposite 4 corners. No human or god can utter such powerful ineffable opposite Cubic Truth. God is singularity. Evil singularity dooms Opposite Creation.
— Gene Ray, timecube.com

NewsCube Australia | Cubic Search

Time Cube

© Cubic Awareness Online, 2004-2007.

Time Cube © Gene Ray, www.TimeCube.com

Time Cube
Do you want to discuss Time Cube with other Cubonauts? If so, then click here for the CubicAO discussion-forum.
Click here to view the CubicAO weblog: HARMONIC DUTY. Contains various Time Cube news and information